

22-07-2026
•For 1,000 m² of non-native forest, that means 5,900 euros. For 1,000 m² of habitat-worthy forest, the same area costs 17,700 euros. Any company applying for an environmental permit that requires felling forest runs into this question eventually. The answer depends on exactly two things: how much forest you fell and what type of forest it is. On top of that, there's a choice many companies overlook entirely: replanting yourself instead of paying.
We see this pattern constantly with companies that come to us right after a felling permit lands on their desk: the first instinct is to pay the financial contribution and close the file. Run the numbers properly, though, and compensating in natura often turns out cheaper, and it hands the company a tangible project it can actually point to, internally and externally. That difference in approach is what this article is about.
The price of forest compensation is the product of three factors: the deforested area in m², a compensation factor between 1 and 3 depending on forest type, and the statutory rate of 5.90 euros per m². This formula sits at the center of the Flemish forest compensation mechanism and is indexed annually.
The compensation factor is where most of the confusion lives. Flanders uses four categories:
The more valuable the ecosystem disappearing, the higher the factor, and the higher the compensation cost. That's not a penalty. It's the Flemish government's attempt to bring the price closer to a market-realistic value for land acquisition, as explicitly confirmed when the rate was raised in 2024.
For 1,000 m² of felled forest, you pay between 5,900 and 17,700 euros depending on forest type. That's the spread between the lowest and highest compensation factor on the exact same surface area.
Concretely, for 1,000 m²:
At larger areas, think a full hectare for a business expansion, this climbs quickly into tens of thousands of euros. In our conversations with sustainability managers who've just been through a permit process, this is often the moment the question shifts from "what does this cost" to "can we approach this differently." Rightly so, because the law leaves room for exactly that.
No, financial compensation is not mandatory. Flemish regulation explicitly allows compensation in natura, through your own reforestation project, or through a combination of physical reforestation and a financial contribution.
That means a company required to fell forest doesn't automatically have to transfer money into the compensation fund. You can carry out a compensating reforestation yourself, or through a specialized partner, potentially with a guarantee on execution. What matters to the authorities is that the ecological value lost gets restored somewhere else, not necessarily that it happens through a bank transfer.
At Forest Forward, we guide companies through exactly that process: from sourcing suitable land to handling the legal paperwork and the ecological design with native species. Our forest compensation guidance takes the entire process off your plate, including stakeholder consultation and permits, so compensation stops being an administrative burden and becomes a real nature project.
Choose in natura compensation if you want more than a bookkeeping exercise to close out your permit obligation. Skip it if you just want the matter settled quickly, with no further involvement.
Choose in natura compensation if:
Choose the financial forest preservation contribution if:
In practice, many of the companies we work with end up choosing a hybrid approach: settle part of the obligation financially where that's faster, and convert another part into a concrete forest project the company can genuinely commit to. That lines up with what we see among companies that already plant trees through Start2Forest as part of their sustainability story: the step toward a full compensation project turns out to be small.
Both can play a role. Since the recent revision of the forest compensation mechanism, local governments can manage their own forest compensation and set their own local contribution, as long as it doesn't fall below the Flemish minimum rate of 5.90 euros/m².
That means the forest preservation contribution is a statutory minimum, not a fixed amount that's identical everywhere. For companies with locations across multiple municipalities, it's worth checking in advance whether the local authority applies its own scheme, since that can affect the final cost. We build this check into every compensation project we set up as standard, precisely because we've repeatedly seen companies get caught off guard by a higher local rate than expected.
That depends on land prices in your region and how much guidance you need, but the statutory contribution of 5.90 euros/m² (multiplied by the compensation factor) is the benchmark to compare against. Market prices for afforestation land typically sit below the highest compensation factors, which often makes in natura compensation the financially attractive option at those higher factors.
At low compensation factors (non-native forest, factor 1), the difference is smaller, and the convenience of paying financially sometimes wins out. At high factors (native broadleaf or habitat-worthy forest, factor 2 or 3), replanting yourself becomes more attractive, both financially and in terms of impact. The deciding variable isn't just land price, it's also whether you can organize design, monitoring, and legal handling yourself or need to outsource it.
Companies looking beyond the bare compensation obligation can also link reforestation to a food forest or a corporate forest that goes further than the statutory minimum, building biodiversity value and their own sustainability story at the same time.
The core takeaway here is that forest compensation isn't a fixed invoice, it's a calculation you can steer yourself, and "in natura" is often not the harder path, but the smarter one. Ask Forest Forward for concrete advice on your forest compensation project and we'll calculate together which approach, financial or in natura, delivers the most for your specific project.
Forest compensation is the legal obligation in Flanders to restore lost forest whenever a company or individual fells forest for a project. This can happen through a financial forest preservation contribution to the compensation fund, or through the company's own reforestation project in natura. The choice and the calculation depend on the area and the type of forest disappearing.
The statutory rate is 5.90 euros per m², multiplied by a compensation factor between 1 and 3 depending on forest type. This rate was set on 1 June 2026 and is indexed annually. Local governments can apply a higher local contribution, but never lower than this Flemish minimum.
The compensation factor is a multiplier that reflects the ecological value of the felled forest. Non-native forest gets factor 1, mixed forest factor 1.5, native broadleaf forest factor 2, and habitat-worthy forest factor 3. The higher the factor, the higher the final compensation cost per m².
Yes, Flemish regulation explicitly allows compensation through your own reforestation project instead of a financial contribution, or through a combination of both. Companies can carry this out themselves or have it guided by a specialized partner, including land acquisition, permits, and ecological design.
For 1 hectare (10,000 m²) of non-native forest, the statutory rate comes to 59,000 euros, while habitat-worthy forest climbs to 177,000 euros. These figures apply to the financial forest preservation contribution; compensation in natura can end up cheaper or more expensive depending on land price and design.
Share this post

Forest Forward Team